Last month, the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) launched a consultation around the technical requirements for Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) disclosures. The consultation will help inform Regulatory Technical Standards for the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, which aims to bring greater transparency to the area of ESG investing.
However, as analysts are making clear, the regulation will present a significant challenge to buy-side firms given the complexity of associated data management tasks. The main hurdle facing asset managers and investment companies is the lack of standardization around how ratings agencies and corporates report on ESG factors. Given that firms source data from multiple providers and alternative datasets and often add their own in-house data and ratings, presenting a large volume of data in a consistent and meaningful ESG disclosure is no small task.
Andrew Barnett, Head of Product RIMES, gives his thoughts: “the sourcing, cross-referencing and data engineering that will be required under the proposed approach is complex and time consuming, particularly when it’s not your core business activity. But this is not an insurmountable challenge: data specialists like RIMES can partner with buy-side firms to take care of the data management tasks, so they can focus on their investments & distribution value proposition.
“What’s more of a worry is the potential impact on innovation of any regulation that’s too prescriptive. The ESG market is young and evolving, and there is a lot of innovation happening out there around different ratings and disclosure methodologies. If buy-side firms and their end customers are to benefit from this experimentation and innovation then regulators must give ESG companies the required time and space. Let’s not forget that it took a long time indeed for credit ratings agencies to be broadly understood and comparable.
“For me, the key now is to focus on transparency and education as the market evolves. The worst-case scenario is that we accidentally regulate the benefits out of a more environmentally responsible approach to investing.”
The content provided in these articles is intended solely for general information purposes, and is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering regulatory or other professional advice or services. Consequently, any use of this information should be done only in consultation with qualified legal counsel. The information in these articles was posted with reasonable care and attention. However, it is possible that some information in these articles is incomplete, incorrect, or inapplicable to particular circumstances or conditions. We do not accept liability for direct or indirect losses resulting from using, relying or acting upon information in these articles.
- Asian Regulators Crack Down on Market Abuse
- BVI Webinar: In-house Data management vs. Data Management as a Service
- RIMES and MSCI Discuss the Latest Developments in ESG Investing
- Are Data Notifications a Risk to Your Business? They Should be the Least of Your Worries!
- Market Surveillance in the Age of COVID: A Regulator’s View