There has been widely publicized misconduct by some financial firms and their employees in the management of financial benchmark activities. Global regulators have taken enforcement actions against numerous firms including unprecedented financial sanctions and the imprisonment of several individuals. Given the extensive use of benchmarks in the economy, it is essential that they are accurate and credible for markets to operate efficiently.
As well as directly supervising some benchmark activities, regulators have imposed and proposed more fundamental intervention in the form of legislative changes. The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently conducted a thematic review of oversights and controls for financial benchmarks (the Review). This paper draws on the conclusions from the Review and evaluates the impact of the significant reforms both completed and under proposal. It also makes recommendations for industry best practice for benchmark activities.
Benchmark activities are complex and expensive to manage. As firms face spiralling benchmark costs they must find new operating approaches. Now is the time to examine processes and procedures surrounding the management of benchmark activities to increase benchmark transparency and comply with new legislation.
- Is it mad to continuously throw money and resources at building in-house enterprise data management solutions?
- Sustainalytics’ ESG Research and Data Available on RIMES Managed Data Service
- RIMES, Invesco, GAM and Catalyst Join Forces to Tame the Data Monster
- RIMES Announces Invesco and GAM to Headline Virtual Panel for Upcoming Data Management Webinar
- ESMA Updates its Benchmarks Register